Why I voted to approve Tyler Nebeker | Guest View

By Dave Teitzel | Jul 14, 2017

On June 6, the Edmonds City Council voted 5-2 to reject Tyler Nebeker to the Edmonds Salary Commission because he was, one, a white male and, two, a member of the Washington Policy Center.

The following explains why I supported Nebeker’s application.

The appointed commissioners must have an ability to use sound reasoning, a willingness to work with a team and good analytical ability in examining salary ranges for the mayor and councilmembers.

Nebeker clearly showed these traits in his interview with the council.

I fully support the goal of diversity in the composition of all Edmonds boards and commissions. However, in this instance, there were only five applicants for the five open Salary Commission openings.

The applicants were all men, even though the openings were publicized in the standard manner.

Nebeker was one of the five.

Diversity has many facets, one of which is age. Nebeker is youthful and, in fact, he was complimented during his interview for his willingness to volunteer his time for the commission at this busy time in his young life.

The Salary Commission is nonpartisan. Liberal or conservative political leanings should not factor into a decision whether to accept or reject a candidate.

The primary consideration should be whether candidates can be objective, work with a team and synthesize facts and data in arriving at appropriate salary recommendations.

The decisions of the Salary Commission do not account for gender. They focus on appropriate salary levels for the gender-neutral positions of Edmonds mayor and Edmonds councilmember, using gender-neutral compensation comparisons for similar positions from other cities in our region.

In light of the these factors, Nebeker was well qualified to serve as a volunteer member of the Salary Commission.

Unfortunately, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas convinced four other councilmembers that Nebeker’s membership in the WPC was an indication he supports wage discrimination against women (and by implication, is a sexist) since one of the WPC policies – in her opinion – argues against additional levels of controls against wage discrimination, even though it is already illegal.

However, in council’s interview with Nebeker, he was not asked his opinion on this particular issue – only whether he generally supported WPC’s policies. This was unfair, and resulted in Nebeker’s rejection as a candidate – a rejection that publicly suggested he supports sexist policies.

The other four councilmembers in the majority have remained silent about the reasons for their vote in this instance, and it is unclear whether they continue to believe their votes were proper.

However, Fraley-Monillas’ recent Guest View in the Beacon (“Why I voted no,” June 29) explaining her role in this matter showed no contrition or indication she would act differently given the same set of circumstances as those underlying Nebeker’s rejection.

This is highly concerning.

We clearly need to actively work toward greater diversity in our local boards and commissions. But what was done in Nebeker’s case was simply not appropriate.

We can do better.

Dave Teitzel is an Edmonds City councilmember.

Comments (0)
If you wish to comment, please login.